Skip to content
PidebugDevOps1 file · +9 −1

Fix conda-forge go-licenses failure in process-compose feedstock

Session from conda-forge-agent-traces on Hugging Face by xhochy · BSD-3-Clause · condensed by Coders Talk

4msession
0interventions
GOAL

Debug a failing rattler-build for the process-compose-feedstock and fix the underlying license detection issue, then validate with rerender and lint.

  1. Prompt · +0
    rattler-build build fails for process-compose-feedstock; run it, observe the error and fix using the conda-forge skill.
  2. Agent did · +0m
    Loaded conda-forge skill docs and ran the failing rattler-build command to capture the error output.
  3. Agent did · +0m
    Diagnosed the failure as go-licenses being unable to detect the license for github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2, read the recipe and the skill's go-licenses reference.
  4. Agent did · +1m
    Edited recipe/recipe.yaml to add --ignore for the chroma/v2 package and a manual copy step for its COPYING file.
  5. Fail · +1m
    Tried to validate the YAML with python3 to sanity-check the edit, but python3 was not found on the system.
  6. Agent did · +1m
    Re-ran the build via pixi exec rattler-build instead; build succeeded with all tests passing.
  7. Agent did · +2m
    Ran conda-smithy rerender and lint to finalize the feedstock changes; lint reported the recipe in fine form.
  8. Outcome · +4m
    Build fixed: recipe.yaml patched for go-licenses ignore + manual COPYING copy, build passes all tests, rerender and lint clean.
VERDICT

I'd start the prompt by pointing straight at the conda-forge skill's go-licenses reference since that's exactly where the fix came from — it saved a lot of guesswork. The python3-not-found hiccup was a minor detour; switching to pixi exec for validation is what actually got the build running again. Overall the skill-guided diagnosis did most of the work here.

I tried this · 0

Discussion · 0

How Builds work