Fix rattler-build failure for process-compose conda-forge feedstock (linux-aarch64)
Session from conda-forge-agent-traces on Hugging Face by xhochy · BSD-3-Clause · condensed by Coders Talk
Click a segment to jump to that moment
3msession
0interventions
GOAL
Debug and fix a failing rattler-build for the process-compose conda-forge feedstock on linux-aarch64, using the conda-forge skill to diagnose CI-style build errors.
- +0Prompt · +0rattler-build build fails for linux_aarch64; run it, observe the error, and fix it using the conda-forge skill.
- +0mAgent did · +0mLoaded the conda-forge skill docs, inspected repo structure, recipe.yaml and the linux_aarch64 CI variant config to understand the build setup.
- +0mAgent did · +0mRan rattler-build for linux_aarch64 and reproduced the failure.
- +0mFail · +0mBuild failed with a go-licenses error: one or more libraries have an incompatible/unknown license.
- +1mAgent did · +1mConsulted the go-licenses workaround reference from the skill, located the build work directory, and found the chroma package's COPYING license file that go-licenses failed to detect.
- +2mAgent did · +2mEdited recipe/recipe.yaml to add --ignore for the chroma/v2 package in the go-licenses command and added manual steps to copy its COPYING file into library_licenses for both Windows and Unix.
- +2mAgent did · +2mCleared the previous build output and re-ran rattler-build for linux_aarch64, confirming the build now succeeds.
- +3mOutcome · +3mBuild succeeded after adding a go-licenses ignore rule and manual COPYING copy for chroma/v2 in recipe.yaml.
VERDICT
Next time I'd point straight at the go-licenses error and check the skill's reference doc first, since that's exactly the known failure mode for chroma/v2's COPYING file. The fix that actually worked was ignoring that package in go-licenses and manually copying its license file into library_licenses — the agent found this by digging into the actual work directory rather than guessing from the error message alone.